
Agarisk
Dodaj komentar Prijavite sePregled
-
Datum osnivanja октобар 11, 1963
-
Sektor Kućni ljubimci
-
Objavljeni poslovi 0
-
Gledao 8
Opis kompanije
This Stage used 3 Reward Models
DeepSeek (Chinese: 深度求索; pinyin: Shēndù Qiúsuǒ) is a Chinese synthetic intelligence business that establishes open-source large language designs (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and moneyed by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, developed the business in 2023 and acts as its CEO.
The DeepSeek-R1 design provides actions comparable to other contemporary large language designs, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a significantly lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for OpenAI’s GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and requires a tenth of the computing power of an equivalent LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek’s AI models were established amidst United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were planned to limit the ability of these 2 nations to develop sophisticated AI systems. [6] [7]
On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek launched its very first complimentary chatbot app, based on the DeepSeek-R1 model, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had actually gone beyond ChatGPT as the most-downloaded totally free app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] causing Nvidia’s share price to stop by 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek’s success against bigger and more established rivals has been explained as “overthrowing AI“, [8] making up “the first chance at what is emerging as a worldwide AI area race”, [11] and introducing “a new age of AI brinkmanship”. [12]
DeepSeek makes its generative expert system algorithms, designs, and training information open-source, permitting its code to be freely available for usage, adjustment, watching, and designing documents for developing functions. [13] The business apparently vigorously recruits young AI researchers from top Chinese universities, [8] and works with from outside the computer system science field to diversify its models’ knowledge and capabilities. [3]
In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI enthusiast Liang Wenfeng, who had actually been trading because the 2007-2008 monetary crisis while participating in Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he developed High-Flyer as a hedge fund concentrated on establishing and using AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer exclusively utilized AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has made its generative expert system chatbot open source, suggesting its code is freely available for usage, adjustment, and watching. This consists of approval to access and use the source code, as well as design documents, for building functions. [13]
According to 36Kr, Liang had actually built up a shop of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are used to train AI [16], before the United States federal government imposed AI chip limitations on China. [15]
In April 2023, High-Flyer started a synthetic basic intelligence lab committed to research developing AI tools separate from High-Flyer’s monetary organization. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the investors, the lab became its own business, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Equity capital firms were reluctant in providing financing as it was unlikely that it would be able to create an exit in a brief time period. [15]
After launching DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which provided strong efficiency for a low price, DeepSeek ended up being called the driver for China’s AI design rate war. It was quickly dubbed the “Pinduoduo of AI“, and other significant tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba began to cut the cost of their AI designs to compete with the company. Despite the low rate charged by DeepSeek, it was successful compared to its rivals that were losing money. [20]
DeepSeek is concentrated on research and has no detailed plans for commercialization; [20] this likewise permits its innovation to avoid the most rigid provisions of China’s AI guidelines, such as needing consumer-facing technology to adhere to the government’s controls on info. [3]
DeepSeek’s hiring preferences target technical capabilities rather than work experience, leading to many brand-new hires being either recent university graduates or developers whose AI careers are less developed. [18] [3] Likewise, the company recruits people with no computer system science background to help its technology comprehend other topics and knowledge areas, including having the ability to produce poetry and carry out well on the notoriously difficult Chinese college admissions tests (Gaokao). [3]
Development and release history
DeepSeek LLM
On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek launched its first series of model, DeepSeek-Coder, which is readily available free of charge to both researchers and commercial users. The code for the model was made open-source under the MIT license, with an additional license arrangement (“DeepSeek license”) regarding “open and responsible downstream usage” for the model itself. [21]
They are of the exact same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed below. The series consists of 8 designs, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]
1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base designs.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of direction information. This produced the Instruct models.
They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, connected by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]
On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek released the DeepSeek-LLM series of models, with 7B and 67B parameters in both Base and Chat types (no Instruct was launched). It was established to take on other LLMs offered at the time. The paper declared benchmark outcomes greater than a lot of open source LLMs at the time, specifically Llama 2. [26]: area 5 Like DeepSeek Coder, the code for the design was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the design itself. [27]
The architecture was essentially the same as those of the Llama series. They utilized the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text gotten by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]
The Chat variations of the 2 Base models was also launched concurrently, obtained by training Base by monitored finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]
On 9 January 2024, they launched 2 DeepSeek-MoE designs (Base, Chat), each of 16B criteria (2.7 B activated per token, 4K context length). The training was basically the like DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was trained on a part of its training dataset. They claimed equivalent efficiency with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a variation of the standard sparsely-gated MoE, with “shared experts” that are always queried, and “routed experts” that might not be. They found this to aid with expert balancing. In standard MoE, some professionals can become extremely counted on, while other experts might be rarely used, wasting specifications. Attempting to stabilize the experts so that they are similarly used then triggers experts to duplicate the very same capacity. They proposed the shared specialists to discover core capabilities that are frequently utilized, and let the routed specialists to find out the peripheral capabilities that are rarely used. [28]
In April 2024, they launched 3 DeepSeek-Math models specialized for doing mathematics: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]
1. Initialize with a formerly pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base model.
3. Train an instruction-following model by SFT Base with 776K math issues and their tool-use-integrated detailed services. This produced the Instruct model.
Reinforcement learning (RL): The benefit model was a procedure reward model (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd approach. [30] This benefit design was then used to train Instruct using group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K mathematics concerns “associated to GSM8K and MATH”. The benefit model was continually updated during training to prevent benefit hacking. This led to the RL design.
V2
In May 2024, they launched the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series includes 4 designs, 2 base models (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The 2 bigger models were trained as follows: [31]
1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K using YaRN. [32] This resulted in DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M instances for helpfulness and 0.3 M for safety. This resulted in DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not launched.
4. RL using GRPO in two phases. The very first stage was trained to fix math and coding issues. This stage used 1 reward design, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for mathematics). The second phase was trained to be useful, safe, and follow guidelines. This stage utilized 3 benefit designs. The helpfulness and security benefit models were trained on human preference information. The rule-based benefit design was by hand set. All trained reward models were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This resulted in the launched variation of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.
They chose 2-staged RL, because they found that RL on reasoning information had “distinct qualities” different from RL on basic information. For example, RL on thinking might enhance over more training actions. [31]
The 2 V2-Lite models were smaller, and trained similarly, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat just underwent SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite version to help “additional research and development on MLA and DeepSeekMoE”. [31]
Architecturally, the V2 designs were substantially customized from the DeepSeek LLM series. They altered the basic attention mechanism by a low-rank approximation called multi-head latent attention (MLA), and used the mixture of specialists (MoE) alternative previously released in January. [28]
The Financial Times reported that it was cheaper than its peers with a cost of 2 RMB for every million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab’s leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]
In June 2024, they launched 4 designs in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]
1. The Base models were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the version at the end of pretraining), then pretrained even more for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base models.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were used to generate 20K code-related and 30K math-related direction data, then integrated with an instruction dataset of 300M tokens. This was used for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The reward for math problems was calculated by comparing to the ground-truth label. The benefit for code problems was produced by a benefit model trained to predict whether a program would pass the system tests.
DeepSeek-V2.5 was launched in September and upgraded in December 2024. It was made by combining DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]
V3
In December 2024, they released a base model DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat model DeepSeek-V3. The design architecture is basically the like V2. They were trained as follows: [37]
1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, primarily English and Chinese. It included a greater ratio of mathematics and programming than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length twice, from 4K to 32K and then to 128K, using YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 dates on 1.5 M samples of reasoning (mathematics, programming, reasoning) and non-reasoning (innovative writing, roleplay, easy question answering) data. Reasoning information was generated by “professional designs”. Non-reasoning data was generated by DeepSeek-V2.5 and examined by people. – The “skilled models” were trained by beginning with an unspecified base model, then SFT on both data, and synthetic data produced by an internal DeepSeek-R1 model. The system prompt asked the R1 to show and verify during thinking. Then the professional designs were RL using an unspecified benefit function.
– Each professional design was trained to generate simply artificial thinking information in one particular domain (mathematics, programming, logic).
– Expert models were utilized, instead of R1 itself, because the output from R1 itself suffered “overthinking, poor format, and excessive length”.
4. Model-based reward models were made by beginning with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human preference data containing both final benefit and chain-of-thought causing the final benefit. The benefit model produced reward signals for both concerns with unbiased however free-form responses, and questions without unbiased answers (such as creative writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO utilizing both reward models and rule-based reward. The rule-based reward was calculated for mathematics issues with a last response (put in a box), and for programs issues by unit tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.
The DeepSeek group carried out substantial low-level engineering to accomplish efficiency. They utilized mixed-precision math. Much of the forward pass was performed in 8-bit drifting point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) rather than the basic 32-bit, requiring unique GEMM routines to collect properly. They utilized a custom-made 12-bit float (E5M6) for just the inputs to the linear layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states were in 16-bit (BF16). They reduced the communication latency by overlapping extensively calculation and communication, such as committing 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for only inter-GPU communication. They reduced communication by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the precise maker each specialist was on in order to prevent particular machines being queried more typically than the others, adding auxiliary load-balancing losses to the training loss function, and other load-balancing techniques. [37]
After training, it was released on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are linked by NVLink, and the clusters are linked by InfiniBand. [37]
Benchmark tests show that DeepSeek-V3 exceeded Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]
R1
On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview ended up being accessible through DeepSeek’s API, along with through a chat user interface after visiting. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for sensible reasoning, mathematical thinking, and real-time problem-solving. DeepSeek declared that it went beyond performance of OpenAI o1 on benchmarks such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal mentioned when it utilized 15 problems from the 2024 edition of AIME, the o1 design reached an option faster than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]
On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek released DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The company also released some “DeepSeek-R1-Distill” designs, which are not initialized on V3-Base, however instead are initialized from other pretrained open-weight models, including LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on synthetic data produced by R1. [47]
A discussion in between User and Assistant. The user asks a concern, and the Assistant fixes it. The assistant initially thinks of the reasoning process in the mind and then provides the user with the answer. The reasoning process and response are enclosed within and tags, respectively, i.e., reasoning procedure here respond to here. User:. Assistant:
DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained exclusively using GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous versions, they used no model-based reward. All reward functions were rule-based, “mainly” of two types (other types were not defined): accuracy benefits and format rewards. Accuracy reward was inspecting whether a boxed response is correct (for math) or whether a code passes tests (for programs). Format reward was checking whether the design puts its thinking trace within … [47]
As R1-Zero has problems with readability and mixing languages, R1 was trained to attend to these concerns and additional improve thinking: [47]
1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on “thousands” of “cold-start” data all with the standard format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the exact same RL procedure as R1-Zero, however likewise with a “language consistency reward” to encourage it to respond monolingually. This produced an internal design not launched.
3. Synthesize 600K reasoning data from the internal design, with rejection tasting (i.e. if the generated reasoning had a wrong final answer, then it is eliminated). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning information (writing, accurate QA, self-cognition, translation) using DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800K synthetic information for 2 dates.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based benefit (for thinking jobs) and model-based benefit (for non-reasoning tasks, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.
Distilled models were trained by SFT on 800K data synthesized from DeepSeek-R1, in a comparable method as action 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]
Assessment and responses
DeepSeek launched its AI Assistant, which utilizes the V3 model as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had actually exceeded ChatGPT as the highest-rated complimentary app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot reportedly addresses concerns, solves reasoning issues and writes computer programs on par with other chatbots on the marketplace, according to benchmark tests used by American AI business. [3]
DeepSeek-V3 uses substantially fewer resources compared to its peers; for example, whereas the world’s leading AI companies train their chatbots with supercomputers utilizing as lots of as 16,000 graphics processing units (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek declares to require only about 2,000 GPUs, specifically the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at an expense of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is roughly one tenth of what United States tech giant Meta spent building its most current AI innovation. [3]
DeepSeek’s competitive efficiency at reasonably very little expense has been acknowledged as possibly challenging the international dominance of American AI designs. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, explained the release of its chatbot as a “Sputnik minute” for American AI. [49] [50] The performance of its R1 model was apparently “on par with” among OpenAI’s latest models when used for jobs such as mathematics, coding, and natural language thinking; [51] echoing other analysts, American Silicon Valley venture capitalist Marc Andreessen similarly described R1 as “AI’s Sputnik moment”. [51]
DeepSeek’s creator, Liang Wenfeng has been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media extensively applauded DeepSeek as a nationwide possession. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China’s Premier Li Qiang invited Liang Wenfeng to his seminar with professionals and asked him to offer opinions and suggestions on a draft for comments of the annual 2024 federal government work report. [55]
DeepSeek’s optimization of limited resources has actually highlighted prospective limitations of United States sanctions on China’s AI advancement, which consist of export restrictions on sophisticated AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the company’s AI models consequently “stimulated market chaos” [57] and caused shares in significant global innovation companies to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia’s stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of rival Broadcom. Other tech firms also sank, including Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google’s owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip devices maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] A worldwide selloff of technology stocks on Nasdaq, prompted by the release of the R1 model, had caused tape-record losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and hardware companies; [59] by 28 January 2025, an overall of $1 trillion of value was rubbed out American stocks. [50]
Leading figures in the American AI sector had blended responses to DeepSeek’s success and efficiency. [60] Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose business are associated with the United States government-backed “Stargate Project” to develop American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek “super remarkable”. [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who announced The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a favorable development. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, including Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk revealed apprehension of the app’s performance or of the sustainability of its success. [60] [66] [67] Various companies, consisting of Amazon Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are looking for to use the model in their program. [68]
On 27 January 2025, DeepSeek restricted its brand-new user registration to telephone number from mainland China, e-mail addresses, or Google account logins, following a “massive” cyberattack interrupted the proper functioning of its servers. [69] [70]
Some sources have observed that the official application programs user interface (API) variation of R1, which ranges from servers located in China, utilizes censorship systems for topics that are thought about politically delicate for the government of China. For example, the model declines to answer questions about the 1989 Tiananmen Square demonstrations and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, comparisons in between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI might at first generate an answer, but then erases it soon afterwards and changes it with a message such as: “Sorry, that’s beyond my current scope. Let’s speak about something else.” [72] The integrated censorship systems and constraints can just be gotten rid of to a restricted extent in the open-source variation of the R1 design. If the “core socialist worths” specified by the Chinese Internet regulative authorities are touched upon, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, discussions are terminated. [74] When tested by NBC News, DeepSeek’s R1 described Taiwan as “an inalienable part of China’s territory,” and specified: “We firmly oppose any form of ‘Taiwan self-reliance’ separatist activities and are committed to achieving the complete reunification of the motherland through peaceful methods.” [75] In January 2025, Western researchers had the ability to deceive DeepSeek into providing certain responses to a few of these subjects by requesting in its answer to swap specific letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]
Security and personal privacy
Some professionals fear that the federal government of China could utilize the AI system for foreign influence operations, spreading out disinformation, security and the development of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek’s privacy terms and conditions state “We store the information we collect in safe servers found in individuals’s Republic of China … We might gather your text or audio input, timely, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other content that you provide to our model and Services”. Although the information storage and collection policy is consistent with ChatGPT’s privacy policy, [79] a Wired article reports this as security concerns. [80] In action, the Italian data defense authority is looking for additional details on DeepSeek’s collection and usage of individual information, and the United States National Security Council announced that it had started a national security evaluation. [81] [82] Taiwan’s government prohibited the use of DeepSeek at government ministries on security grounds and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission opened a questions into DeepSeek’s use of personal details. [83]
Artificial intelligence market in China.
Notes
^ a b c The number of heads does not equivalent the variety of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the design named DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was released as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview required choosing “Deep Think made it possible for”, and every user might use it only 50 times a day.
References
^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). “China’s cheap, open AI model DeepSeek thrills scientists”. Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). “The DeepSeek panic reveals an AI world all set to blow”. The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). “How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Taking On Silicon Valley Giants”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s more affordable designs and weaker chips call into concern trillions in AI facilities spending”. Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). “Biden admin’s cap on GPU exports may strike India’s AI aspirations”. The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). “Nvidia investigation signals broadening of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly”. Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). “Nvidia targeted by China in brand-new chip war probe”. BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.?”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI dismisses ChatGPT on App Store: Here’s what you should understand”. CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, and why is it triggering Nvidia and other stocks to slump?”. CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). “Nvidia, Microsoft shares tumble as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants”. ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I.” The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). “ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta’s LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key”. Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). “How a top Chinese AI design conquered US sanctions”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the initial on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). “Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker”. ChinaTalk. Archived from the initial on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). “Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I.” CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023).” [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won’t Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says”. Yicai Global. Archived from the original on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). “Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is changing how AI models are trained”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). “The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI leader”. Financial Times. Archived from the original on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). “Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China’s AI Race”. ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at main · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming – The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ “DeepSeek Coder”. deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ “deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at primary”. huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at primary”. huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ “deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at primary”. huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). “Chinese start-up DeepSeek’s new AI design outshines Meta, OpenAI products”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, outperforms Llama and Qwen on launch”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek’s brand-new AI design seems one of the finest ‘open’ challengers yet”. TechCrunch. Archived from the initial on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ “Deepseek Log in page”. DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: unleashing supercharged reasoning power!”. DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the original on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). “DeepSeek’s first thinking design R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 performance”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). “Don’t Look Now, but China’s AI Is Catching Up Fast”. The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs through Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ “Chinese AI startup DeepSeek surpasses ChatGPT on Apple App Store”. Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). “American AI has reached its Sputnik moment”. The Hill. Archived from the original on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). “‘ Sputnik moment’: $1tn cleaned off US stocks after Chinese company unveils AI chatbot” – by means of The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). “Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets”. BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI startup that shook the tech world?|CNN Business”. CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ “DeepSeek postures a challenge to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley”. The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, (30 January 2025). “Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock rout, Graphika says”. Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ 澎湃新闻 (22 January 2025). “量化巨头幻方创始人梁文锋参加总理座谈会并发言 , 他还创办了” AI界拼多多””. finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). “Chinese AI business’s AI model breakthrough highlights limits of US sanctions”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek updates – Chinese AI chatbot stimulates US market chaos, wiping $500bn off Nvidia”. BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). “Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap”. Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek triggers worldwide AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of value”. Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek, Calling It ‘Impressive’ however Staying Skeptical”. Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella promotes DeepSeek’s open-source AI as “very outstanding”: “We need to take the advancements out of China really, very seriously””. Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). “OpenAI’s Sam Altman calls DeepSeek model ‘remarkable'”. The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). “Trump calls China’s DeepSeek AI app a ‘wake-up call’ after tech stocks slide”. The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). “Johnson bashes China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek development “positive””. Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). “China’s A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street” – via NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). “Musk dismisses, Altman praises: What leaders state on DeepSeek’s disruption”. Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Elon Musk ‘questions’ DeepSeek’s claims, recommends huge Nvidia GPU facilities”. Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. “Big AWS customers, including Stripe and Toyota, are hounding the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI models”. Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek hit with ‘large-scale’ cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app shops”. The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. “DeepSeek momentarily restricted new sign-ups, mentioning ‘large-scale harmful attacks'”. Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI has actually sparked a $1 trillion panic – and it does not care about totally free speech”. The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek: This is what live censorship looks like in the Chinese AI chatbot”. Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). “We experimented with DeepSeek. It worked well, up until we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “The Guardian view on an international AI race: geopolitics, development and the increase of turmoil”. The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI DeepSeek jolts Silicon Valley, giving the AI race its ‘Sputnik minute'”. NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI positions formidable cyber, information privacy hazards”. Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). “Experts urge care over use of Chinese AI DeepSeek”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s success has actually painted a substantial TikTok-shaped target on its back”. LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Privacy policy”. Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Italy regulator inquires from DeepSeek on data protection”. Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). “White House examines result of China AI app DeepSeek on nationwide security, official states”. Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.